[pp.int.general] EU consultation about private copying levies

Andrew Norton andrew.norton at pirate-party.us
Tue Feb 19 00:22:32 CET 2008


Carlos Ayala wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> Until 18th of April, we are allowed to send our replies to a public
> consultation on private copying levies:
> 
> - here is the questionnaire
> <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/levy_reform/questionnaire_en.pdf>
> - here is the background document
> <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/levy_reform/background_en.pdf>
> 
> and here is the announcement:
> 
> "In order to deepen the Commission's understanding on the functioning of
> private copying levy schemes set up at national level, a second 'call
> for comments' is issued.
> [...]
> 
> All stakeholders are invited to comment on the issues in the attached
> second call for comments. Answers and comments, which may cover all or
> only a limited number of the issues mentioned in the background
> document, should reach the e-mail address markt-d1 at ec.europa.eu
> <mailto:markt-d1 at ec.europa.eu> by 18 April 2008.
> 
> 
> If stakeholders wish to submit confidential responses, they should
> indicate clearly which part of their submission is confidential and
> should not be published on the Commission's website. All other
> submissions, not clearly marked as confidential, may be published by the
> Commission.
> 
> 
> This call for comments follows an earlier consultation launched in June
> 2006:
> 
> 
> - Questionnaire 2006
> <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/levy_reform/stakeholder_consultation_en.pdf>
> 
> - Replies to the public consultation 2006
> <http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/markt/markt_consultations/library?l=/copyright_neighbouring/stakeholder_consultation&vm=detailed&sb=Title>"
> 
> 
> Of course we would may decide to answer separately, each party sending
> its own reply; however, coordinating a joint reply as PPI we would may
> appear stronger for the European Commission's eyes, and our voice would
> may sound louder. What do you think? Regards

Why not both - each party seperately, AND one from the PPI (which is a
seperate org, representing us all, same as the MPAA is a seperate org
from warner, sony etc. despite being made of them)

Andrew Norton
PPUS

> 
> 
>                                                                                         
> Carlos Ayala
>                                                                                         
> ( Aiarakoa )
> 
>                                                          Presidente de
> la Junta Directiva Nacional de PIRATA
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ¿Con Mascota por primera vez? - Sé un mejor Amigo
> Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas
> <http://es.rd.yahoo.com/evt:51361/*http://es.answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTE4ZWhyZjU0BF9TAzIxMTQ3MTQzMjIEc2VjA0Jhbm5lcgRzbGsDQWNxdWlzaXRpb24-?link=over&sid=XXXXXXXX>.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general



More information about the pp.international.general mailing list