[pp.int.general] Copenhagen, our turn to dive into

Richard Stallman rms at gnu.org
Thu Dec 17 12:12:11 CET 2009

    time into planning something we _can_ do, like focus on the COMPLETE
    LACK of ip provisions in the treaties.

Using the term "IP" is a bad habit of vagueness.
Are you concerned by a lack of trademark provisions?
Or is it mainly patent provisions that you want to advocate?

More information about the pp.international.general mailing list