[pp.int.general] copyright vs. "droit d'auteur"

[Carlos Ayala Vargas]

Per von Zweigbergk wrote:
> Maybe copyright reform makes the GPL a bit weaker, but I think the 
> tradeoff is worth it. And while protection of the authors moral 
> "rights" might be nice to have, if you're an author, it's simply 
> incompatible with the idea of broader imaginary property reform for 
> the 21st century.
As long as you agreed in a former mail about how important is to avoid 
misattribution -and I bind both paternity and integrity as the two 
solely moral rights (currently existing, and currently being wanted by 
PIRATA to exist)-, I think you also agree on those two moral rights 
being compatible with the reform conceived by us for the 21st century 
-and only those two, without adding that /moral/ (?) /right/ commented 
by Reinier ("/frankly, I would appreciate a "moral" right of the author 
to *decide on the use of his work* after the term for commercial 
exploitation has expired/" ... I think the exclusive right to make 
derivative works is not a moral right, but a commercial right; thus, 
Reinier's proposal doesn't equate with commercial rights, at least some 
of them never, expiring? If it's its meaning, I have to disagree with 
such proposal)-. Regards,


                                                                                               
Carlos Ayala
                                                                                               
( Aiarakoa )
 
                                                                          
Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman