[pp.int.general] "Natural" law

[Reinier Bakels]

> While I'm keen to follow Jorge, David, Andy and others' advice and 
> continue this in PPI forum, if Reinier rejects this too and continues the 
> debate here in the PPI list, it would make no sense to reply him there; 
> thus, until Reinier accepts to move this debate to the PPI forum, I'll 
> have to continue replying him here.

Where is the PPI forum?

Anyway, I guess the topics we discuss here are pretty essential. I am trying 
to be more concise - you too?

Anyway, if you believe that politicians and others who do not interpret 
human rights in the way you believe is correct are *liers* then we better 
end our discussion. I suggest you join an action group. The actvist paradigm 
is different. If you have the ambition to be a politician, you should be 
prepared to take responsibility for policy, in a coalition, without a 
majority, and still trying to influence politics in youy direction. The 
"catalytic" approach, as I called it: trying to get more influence than 
justified by the number os seats, because you are really convincing.

An frankly, that would not be very difficult in this field. All fields of 
intellectual property law have consistently been neglected by politics over 
many decades. Improvement is easy, unless you spoil it by becoming 
fundamentalist. And now I use this word on purpose.

reinier