[pp.int.general] Pirate Manifesto: status of internal ballots

[David Arcos]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Reinier Bakels <r.bakels at pr.unimaas.nl>wrote:

> Reinier Bakels wrote:
>>
>>> Thx4 your since comments.
>>> Some preliminary answers.
>>> First, my schedule simply did not allow me to react earlier.
>>>
>>
>> So, just because you've been 'too busy' (we're ALL busy people) and
>> finally found time in your schedule for us, we're supposed to drop what 12
>> people have worked on quite a bit?
>>
> "What two people can do in two weeks, three people can do in three weeks."
> More people is not always efficient.



The objective is not the "efficiency", but the consensus of all the implied
parties.

The manifesto can be better or worse, but the most important thing is that
all parties agree with it (or, at least, nobody disagrees).

Having a "joint/common" manifesto is much more important than having a
"perfect" manifesto.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20090115/e9f0da2e/attachment.htm>