[pp.int.general] cultural flatrate: PP position?
Richard Stallman
rms at gnu.org
Tue Jun 9 06:25:06 CEST 2009
I apologize (again), I forgot how important terminology is (and sensitive).
But, frankly, doesn't the above scenario demonstrate that "free software" is
not entirely free? It may seem paradoxical, but Microsoft does *not* have
the freedom to integrate "free" code in its proprietary products?
That fallacious argument can be restated with this haiku:
Using GPL
Is encroaching on our rights
To encroach on yours
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list