[pp.int.general] cultural flatrate: PP position?
Christian
pp at christian-hufgard.de
Thu Jun 11 14:36:15 CEST 2009
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I grant my respect for not freeing a work only for a very limited amount
> of time. My idea would be, to enhance this time, the "freer" the work
> would be spoken in terms of cc:
> cc-by-nd-nc would be one year of copyright.
> ...
> cc-by would be six years of copyright.
>
> I think 6 years is not long enough for the case of free copylefted
> free works. Ten years is long enough, at least for software.
10 years would also be fine for me. If I remember correctly, the uppsala
declaration uses the term "one generation". Would be also sufficent for me.
> After six years even closed source would be free.
>
> If you mean proprietary programs whose source is secret, how would
> you achieve that? The only way to make them free is to get the source
> code published.
Or allow reverse engineering. This is another fact, where the
governments can show their force: Simply refuse buying closed source
anymore.
Christian
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list