[pp.int.general] Protest certain musicians?

Nicolas Sahlqvist nicco77 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 1 13:27:48 CET 2009


On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Christian Hufgard
<pp at christian-hufgard.de>wrote:

> Nicolas Sahlqvist wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Christian Hufgard
> > <pp at christian-hufgard.de>wrote:
>
> It is up to the "artist" that releases the music to
> > decide if it is free content where later a court of law may deem it is
> not
> > due to how inspired the "artist" was of unfree content. This happens in
> the
> > commercial music industry and artists loose there revenue in such court
> > cases so how can you be sure that the music that is claimed to be free
> > actually is free?
>
> Well, there's a big difference between "being inspired by someone else",
>  "using someone elses vocals" and "declare own work as free". :)
>
> Yes, but in the kind of music I listen to mostly (techno, dance, trance,
electronic etc.) and all the remixes makes the line so fine that a court has
a hard time figuring out where to draw the line so back to my question, what
is actually free and unfree?


- Nicolas
  PPI / PPSE member
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20091101/e22abeb7/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the pp.international.general mailing list