[pp.int.general] Greens saying Pirate Parties unnecessary

[David Arcos]

I use "Imaginary Property" ;-)



On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Eric Priezkalns <
eric.priezkalns at pirateparty.org.uk> wrote:

> Is there an alternative term for the class of things which all get treated
> as property, but which lack physical substance?  As we're interested in
> reforming laws relating to that class of things, it would be helpful if
> there was a recognized shorthand for referring to them.
>
> E
>
>
> On 16 Sep 2009, at 16:17, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
>    2) The Pirate Party prioritizes IP reform and protecting privacy.
>>
>> Please don't call the topic "IP".  It is vital to teach people not
>> to think of copyrights and patents and trademarks and trade secrets
>> as one single issue.  (See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html.)
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20090916/f74f6138/attachment.htm>