[pp.int.general] Greens saying Pirate Parties unnecessary

[Ole Husgaard]

Hi,

IMHO it is wrong to even think about this as property. It is
state-sanctioned monopolies.

In my native language we do not use a term like "Immaterial Property",
but a word that directly translates into "Immaterial Rights".

Best Regards,

Ole Husgaard.

Eric Priezkalns skrev:
> Is there an alternative term for the class of things which all get
> treated as property, but which lack physical substance?  As we're
> interested in reforming laws relating to that class of things, it
> would be helpful if there was a recognized shorthand for referring to
> them.
>
> E
>
> On 16 Sep 2009, at 16:17, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
>>    2) The Pirate Party prioritizes IP reform and protecting privacy.
>>
>> Please don't call the topic "IP".  It is vital to teach people not
>> to think of copyrights and patents and trademarks and trade secrets
>> as one single issue.  (See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html.)
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>