[pp.int.general] Why Free Software misses the point
Boris Turovskiy
tourovski at gmail.com
Fri May 14 17:29:31 CEST 2010
Hi I.K.,
> To me this point of view also seems anti-pirate in a certain sense.
> Think about what do we stand for fundamentaly. A wording may be
> different, but it is basically that people's free access to
> information (as long as it is not for commercial purposes) is their
> fundamental right.
Here comes the first point, the non-commercial clause - good that you
pointed it out for me. The Pirate ideas usually make a clear distinction
between "commercial" and "non-commercial", with most of our positions
focusing on freedoms in the non-commercial area. However, it is
explicitly stated in the FSF's description of "essential freedoms" that
there should not be a difference between commercial and non-commercial
use and distribution. And if we applied their position to other works,
the hugely popular (among pirates, too) CC-BY-NC license would be
considered just as "bad" or "unfree" as a "all rights reserved" license.
> And restricting this access is unethical.
> For example, restricting people's access to a book is unethical. So
> why restricting people's access to a source code is fine with you? It
> is just another kind of information. And AFAIK, PPG treats software in
> the same way as all the other creations - so why don't you demand the
> same treatment for it as for the others?
Not access itself but the possibility of sharing (granting access to
others) or modifying of something I already have access to. If a writer
writes a book and locks it in their drawer, we don't arrive at their
door saying "Show us the book, you don't have the rights to restrict our
access to it!"; neither can we force a band to put their releases online
in uncompressed form if they decide to only release them in mp3. In the
same way, if a software developer writes a program and releases only the
compiled version, not the code, it's his right. After all, we require
that there be a right of sharing, not an obligation to do so.
Best regards,
Boris
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list