[pp.int.general] PPi ask Anonymous to stop Payback

[Rodrigo dA]

I personally don't agree, civil disobedience is perfectly reasonable when 
those in powers have their own agenda and don't pay attention.
We should focus on changing those laws and let anon alone, it's not like
they are going to say Ok and stop the attacks anyway xD

-rodrigo
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:38:35 -0500
> From: ktetch at gmail.com
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] PPi ask Anonymous to stop Payback
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 11/20/2010 3:13 PM, Partidul Piratilor wrote:
> > First: We protest against the subject line:  it was PP US and PP UK who
> > wrote the letter.
> 
> Choms is quite clearly an O:P member. As the rest of his email's have
> shown, he's not really one for facts.
> 
> > 
> > Second: Romanian PP does not endorse the way things were said in the
> > letter. The Operation was already fading and the new dispute only serves
> > the interests of MPAA and the likes.
> 
> Well, yes. We did write the letter fairly and without mass accusation.
> The way certain members of it have responded does give the sense of an
> agent provocateur involved with O:P. While the new 'dispute' may play to
> the MPAA and their ilk, it currently has not done so to anything like
> the degree the original O:P did.
> 
> > It's interesting to see if any link exists between the FBI investigation
> > and the fact that some pirates got suddenly on the side of the law? 
> 
> We in the US have always been on the side of the law. Now, wanting some
> laws changed, that's different from breaking those laws. That way
> anarchy lies, and anarchy serves no-one.
> 
> >It's
> > interesting to see how there are laws you respect (computer crime) and
> > laws you don't (copyright). Any criteria on choosing them?
> 
> Actually, we respect *ALL* laws (it's a requirement for a political
> party in the US, if it isn't in Romania, great, you're operating in a
> much nicer, easier system than we are. The likes of Sanziana Buruiana
> wouldn't even get started here, except in maybe one or two states that
> have sane ballot access laws). There are some laws we want changed
> though. However, the computer crimes one isn't one of them, as it's
> written pretty fairly, and does deal with a problem.
> 
> > 
> > PS: Please do not bother to respond. Although it contains question marks
> > it's only a statement.
> > 
> > Cristian
> > Romanian PP spokesperson
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Andrew Norton
> http://ktetch.blogspot.com
> Tel: (352)6-KTETCH [352-658-3824]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM6DHLAAoJECjjuYTW3X5H1yAH/2CAduJccMEmciW10x6yh8+N
> Ia6hZ1eVhLtkBUilJ+stOAILcwqhf8/6dPH31vwuAlrM+cwdoEPq/MfkVg8oCiDo
> S9d0aI/xGS6XP+kkCOp40GRCWrcYSIsR5EwXG4BkNeteOqlNoDRVFYIRH9fLjn3q
> psW0EtzEuEuPXF3xLpa1Xf+4oiAo3NdjTxSfjX+BfmAHlJgOvqURVRnX/6qIbaRP
> WL56nFq/xTxqWXUbKfzEL31ylIxLF88LXtOT5JbVDHLKz0HCWUla3M7X85ZUpsZb
> kzZL/iHzkKqUxVmpPVTQ38w0JJmnGPTVegvnH2a5GFsQ+OHtG578O+sdO606Uzw=
> =eKzv
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20101120/cbba0649/attachment.htm>