[pp.int.general] Terminology: P2P

[Marcus Kesler]

But most of the special interest groups are moronic enough to pretend
that it is only used for criminal purposes.

On 11/22/2010 9:22 AM, John Fanning wrote:
> It is moronic. The internet itself runs p2p.
> 
> john
> 
> - I don't think a country would be monoric to actually say P2P itself is 
> illegal.
> 
> John W Fanning
> Chairman Netcapital
> john at netcapital.com
> facebook.com/gninnaf
> twitter.com/john_fanning
> 781-925-1600 Direct
> 650-814-8800 Cell
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIAL PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: Unless otherwise specified, all ideas,
> creative concepts and opinions, including 
> any attachments, as well as the selection, assembly and arrangement thereof,
> are the sole property of Netcapital.com LLC
>  © 2010, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The content of this email is the property of
> Netcapital.com LLC and is 
> protected by U.S. and international copyright and other intellectual
> property laws. You may view, download, print and 
> retain a copy of pages of this email only for your own personal use. Except
> as expressly provided above, you may not 
> use, download, upload, copy, print, display, perform, reproduce, republish,
> modify, license, post, transmit or distribute any 
> information from this email in whole or in part without our prior written
> permission. If you wish to obtain permission to 
> reprint or reproduce any materials appearing here contact the sender. All
> rights not expressly granted herein are reserved. 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pp.international.general-bounces at lists.pirateweb.net
> [mailto:pp.international.general-bounces at lists.pirateweb.net] On Behalf Of
> Justus Römeth
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 5:42 AM
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: [pp.int.general] Terminology: P2P
> 
> Just a quick thing that I read multiple times, and would like to get 
> accross:
> 
> - I don't think a country would be monoric to actually say P2P itself is 
> illegal. I for one enjoy downloading stuff like Ubuntu via torrents, for 
> example. Now sharing copyrighted material, on the other hand, is illegal 
> in a few countries, may that be P2P or by other means. I think it is 
> important to distinguish between the two, as it is legally (!) not the 
> same thing. If we don't distinguish between the two, how can we expect 
> lawmakers from traditional parties to do that?
> 
> Thx for reading this.
> -J
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general