[pp.int.general] PPi ask Anonymous to stop Payback

[Marcus Kesler]

Let me finish my discussion on this topic with this question:

What is your experience with US political law and what is your
involvement in US politics?

Let me point you to page 563 paragraph 3 sentence 5 on the unwritten
"This is how Americans Think" rulebook. I am sorry that the American
mindset on this matter is not codified into law for you.

I am not telling any other pirate party how to run their business, we
tried to explain why we have to do what we have to do.

I am sorry that people who have absolutely nothing to do with the USPP
and have no iron in this fire feel that we owe them a justification. We
don't, and any attempt to give you one has been "You don't know what you
are talking about".

So that will be the end from me on this subject.

Marcus
Pirate Party of Oklahoma

On 11/24/2010 12:44 PM, Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
> Show me the law, not your words.
> 
> Did you spoke about river poisoning? so, you are in favour of polluting!
> 
> Did you spoke against EVERY murder? so you support it!
> 
> As you can see, I can't trust you.
> 
> 
> Al 24/11/10 19:39, En/na Marcus Kesler ha escrit:
>> There does not have to be a relationship between USPP&  O:P. The rule in
>> US media&  politics is as follows: If you don't speak out against it,
>> then it must mean that you support it.
>>
>> That is the reason USPP spoke out against it.
>>
>> On 11/24/2010 11:39 AM, Choms wrote:
>>   
>>> More insults and empty talk... If you cannot argument without
>>> insulting people, better don't write more, please.
>>>
>>> The only argument you give on all this time is "O:P are stupid liars
>>> scriptkiddies, they need to be exterminated".
>>>
>>> I think you have a personal problems with some people, maybe you have
>>> to fix it before continue fouling the list...
>>>
>>> Anyway, as you said: "We do not promote, advocate, support, or engage
>>> in illegal activities.
>>> Where there is a disparity between individual action and the law, the
>>> law wins. However, if the law is incorrect, based on incorrect or
>>> invalid principles, or created because of political pressures rather
>>> than because it's right, we hold that these laws should be changed.
>>> Changing a law does not require civil disobedience."
>>> You are the only one inventing a relationship between USPP and
>>> Payback... as far as I know, there's no relationship between both,
>>> so... why do you say PPi is supporting Payback and USPP needs to
>>> condemn it? (and the liars are O:P, of course :rolleyes:)
>>>
>>> I don't know who said there's a relation between PPi and Payback, but
>>> that completely is FALSE, and I don't understand it...
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> El 24/11/2010, a las 18:07, Andrew Norton escribió:
>>>
>>>     
>>>> [...] tl;dr [...]
>>>>        
>>> ____________________________________________________
>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>      
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>    
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general