[pp.int.general] PPi ask Anonymous to stop Payback

[Kenneth Peiruza]

Still avoiding facts with words? Show me the law or stop lying.


Al 24/11/10 19:48, En/na Marcus Kesler ha escrit:
> Let me finish my discussion on this topic with this question:
>
> What is your experience with US political law and what is your
> involvement in US politics?
>
> Let me point you to page 563 paragraph 3 sentence 5 on the unwritten
> "This is how Americans Think" rulebook. I am sorry that the American
> mindset on this matter is not codified into law for you.
>
> I am not telling any other pirate party how to run their business, we
> tried to explain why we have to do what we have to do.
>
> I am sorry that people who have absolutely nothing to do with the USPP
> and have no iron in this fire feel that we owe them a justification. We
> don't, and any attempt to give you one has been "You don't know what you
> are talking about".
>
> So that will be the end from me on this subject.
>
> Marcus
> Pirate Party of Oklahoma
>
> On 11/24/2010 12:44 PM, Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
>    
>> Show me the law, not your words.
>>
>> Did you spoke about river poisoning? so, you are in favour of polluting!
>>
>> Did you spoke against EVERY murder? so you support it!
>>
>> As you can see, I can't trust you.
>>
>>
>> Al 24/11/10 19:39, En/na Marcus Kesler ha escrit:
>>      
>>> There does not have to be a relationship between USPP&   O:P. The rule in
>>> US media&   politics is as follows: If you don't speak out against it,
>>> then it must mean that you support it.
>>>
>>> That is the reason USPP spoke out against it.
>>>
>>> On 11/24/2010 11:39 AM, Choms wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> More insults and empty talk... If you cannot argument without
>>>> insulting people, better don't write more, please.
>>>>
>>>> The only argument you give on all this time is "O:P are stupid liars
>>>> scriptkiddies, they need to be exterminated".
>>>>
>>>> I think you have a personal problems with some people, maybe you have
>>>> to fix it before continue fouling the list...
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, as you said: "We do not promote, advocate, support, or engage
>>>> in illegal activities.
>>>> Where there is a disparity between individual action and the law, the
>>>> law wins. However, if the law is incorrect, based on incorrect or
>>>> invalid principles, or created because of political pressures rather
>>>> than because it's right, we hold that these laws should be changed.
>>>> Changing a law does not require civil disobedience."
>>>> You are the only one inventing a relationship between USPP and
>>>> Payback... as far as I know, there's no relationship between both,
>>>> so... why do you say PPi is supporting Payback and USPP needs to
>>>> condemn it? (and the liars are O:P, of course :rolleyes:)
>>>>
>>>> I don't know who said there's a relation between PPi and Payback, but
>>>> that completely is FALSE, and I don't understand it...
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> El 24/11/2010, a las 18:07, Andrew Norton escribió:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> [...] tl;dr [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> ____________________________________________________
>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>
>>>        
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>      
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>