[pp.int.general] Correct word usage for PP.
ningunotro at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 11 21:18:22 CEST 2011
El lun, 11-04-2011 a las 13:46 -0400, Richard Stallman escribió:
> IMO it's time for philosophy to open its faculty by adapting current and
> prevalent vocabularies - if philosophers want to be heard.
> Not if the words you have in mind carry assumptions that conflict
> with what you want to say. By using them, you will be heard;
> but not with the message you had in mind.
I can fully agree with that ;)
I've got the same kind of trouble when I am asked to do not with a
different vocabulary, but simply with fewer words :(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the pp.international.general