[pp.int.general] Correct word usage for PP.

[NingúnOtro]

El lun, 11-04-2011 a las 13:46 -0400, Richard Stallman escribió:
> IMO it's time for philosophy to open its faculty by adapting current and 
>     prevalent vocabularies - if philosophers want to be heard.
> 
> Not if the words you have in mind carry assumptions that conflict
> with what you want to say.  By using them, you will be heard;
> but not with the message you had in mind.

I can fully agree with that ;)

I've got the same kind of trouble when I am asked to do not with a
different vocabulary, but simply with fewer words :(

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20110411/c6cf3769/attachment.pgp>