[pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)

[Zbigniew Łukasiak]

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com> wrote:
> Then all we have to do is explainig in simple wording or like an easy
> digestable visual commercial video how this ethical body (in the perfect
> future) works, or how to give these abstract functions a 'face'
>
> There should be 2 simultaneous parallel discussion threads.
> One I call PRACTICE (pragmatism), dealing with real time real life, no room
> for discussions about opinions, dogma or filosofies etc.-the domain of
> moral-
> Here problems are SOLVED. The tool liquid democracy is a good example (still
> misunderstood by MOST pirates)
>
> Two I call ETHICA, where all timeless issues are gathered and kept open for
> discussion eternally.

OK - I think can work.  The point is - how this can be done in
PRACTICE?  Would the theoretical oriented ETHICA people accept any
concrete (PRACTICAL) arrangement about how this split is done?

-- 
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/