[pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)

Antonio Garcia ningunotro at hotmail.com
Sun Aug 19 17:21:25 CEST 2012


decided democratically... is not godgiven fact. it is not only the vote, even nested a few levels, but how you get to the vote... if ever needed. please define methodology and circumstances.

> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:42:36 +0200
> From: zzbbyy at gmail.com
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA	Conference)
> 
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > ethica is among other things about how not to alienate those that for
> > coherence's sake can not afford to drop ethical behaviour.
> >
> > it can be treated separately only insofar as the practice and the pragmatism
> > treated separately are not a simple way to sidetrack and ditch it.
> >
> > a pragmatic lack of ethic, for instance... would not be accepted, or at
> > least should not be accepted.
> >
> > i know what kind of associations/gatherings i do not want to be part of...
> > and i guess many other do know too.
> 
> Hmm - one more question: was ''voting on how to vote to decide the
> method of voting' very ethical because every aspect was decided
> democratically?
> 
> -- 
> Zbigniew Lukasiak
> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120819/cb1f1f2f/attachment.html>


More information about the pp.international.general mailing list