[pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)

[Antonio Garcia]

oh, yeah, it would... if common sense were not the least common of senses among most of the people ;(

is it about not wanting one more definition, or not wanting any definition at all?

we can not work in a void where everyone understands what he pleases about everything and all, and not one word has the same meaning for any two different people, organisations, parties, etc.

at this moment we might even have trouble getting two individuals to agree on what ir really and ultimately means... to be a pirate. do we favour an "everyone can handle his own definition" approach for popularity's sake, or do we really know what we are... and what we are not?

do we dare to speak about it?

Antonio.


> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:24:44 +0200
> From: zzbbyy at gmail.com
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA	Conference)
> 
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > decided democratically... is not godgiven fact. it is not only the vote,
> > even nested a few levels, but how you get to the vote... if ever needed.
> > please define methodology and circumstances.
> 
> Do we need any more definitions and other theory here?  Woudn't be
> common sense enough?
> 
> Z.
> 
> -- 
> Zbigniew Lukasiak
> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120819/a86356f2/attachment.html>