[pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)
ningunotro at hotmail.com
Sun Aug 19 18:06:08 CEST 2012
having looked at what went on...
... i'm still asking myself... what were the rules, if any?
we can not go on and continue... it being a russian roulette whether existing rules finally get enforced or not... with the not winning in too many occasions.
> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:57:54 +0200
> From: zzbbyy at gmail.com
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > oh, yeah, it would... if common sense were not the least common of senses
> > among most of the people ;(
> > is it about not wanting one more definition, or not wanting any definition
> > at all?
> > we can not work in a void where everyone understands what he pleases about
> > everything and all, and not one word has the same meaning for any two
> > different people, organisations, parties, etc.
> > at this moment we might even have trouble getting two individuals to agree
> > on what ir really and ultimately means... to be a pirate. do we favour an
> > "everyone can handle his own definition" approach for popularity's sake, or
> > do we really know what we are... and what we are not?
> I hope that this is actually separate from the problems at the
> conference. I do agree that we need to work on the dogma etc - but I
> am not convinced that this needs to be taken into account when
> planning conference proceeding rules. I hope that in that case we
> could agree on the standard European tradition in that matter - at
> least for the time being to start things off.
> Zbigniew Lukasiak
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pp.international.general