[pp.int.general] Online voting versus online discussion
anne-marie victor
mariemini at gmail.com
Sun Dec 9 14:33:38 CET 2012
Hello!
This is my first post in the PPI ML and my english isn't famous. But I the
issue seems very important to me.
I think that Zbigniew Lukasiak is absolutely right and that the
international discussion should be enriched and diversified with many blogs
and ML.
But how to manage the complexity? How could the communication stMaybe could
the Opensource world be helpful and give us some models?
In my own country, France, we haven't got yet a satisfactory solution. We
are trying to improve our internal communication. But in my opinion it
remains relatively poor and too often dedicated to internal problems.
And GA shouldn't be the place to discuss complex issues.
So what can to do to get more creative?
2012/12/9 Zbigniew Łukasiak <zzbbyy at gmail.com>
> Short version:
>
> online voting - no
> (
> http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2012/10/155536-internet-voting-in-the-us/fulltext
> )
>
> online discussion - yes
>
> Longer version:
>
> Comming from the Open Source world I am surprised by the scarcity of
> international disscussion in the Pirate Movement. This list and the
> PirateTimes are perhaps the only places where the international pirate
> topics are discussed. This is not enough - if that was an Open Source
> project you'd have many individual blogs and many more mailing lists
> where people would discuss stuff from many angles and also in more
> personal less formal ways.
>
> I have the feeling that all that discussion that does not happen
> online is then crammed into the General Assemblies. In my opinion GAs
> should be just a matter of recording the consensus on matters that
> would be exhaustingly discussed online. That is not to say that
> discussion would be forbidden - only that we should try to avoid it.
>
> Online voting is a can of worms - it can probably work well for
> non-secret voting - but to get it right is much more difficult than it
> seems. Especially in the context of international negotiations we
> cannot put so much faith in the administators of the system. And
> please read the paper linked above.
> Of course discussion systems are subject of similar concerns - but it
> does not need to be so centralized - and beside that it would be
> subject to the supervision of the safe, in person, GA.
>
>
> --
> Zbigniew Lukasiak
> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- n�chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20121209/21df3cfc/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list