[pp.int.general] Is Liquid Feedback still being developed?

[Boris Turovskiy]

Ahoi Zbigniew,

the original developers of Liquid Feedback have never been known to be
particularly enthusiastic about contributors to "their" software, nor
do they welcome modifications to it which do not corerspond with their
vision of how it is done the "right" way. They even wrote an open
letter some weeks ago where they criticize the way LQFB is used in the
Pirate Party of Germany ([1], German) because we do not implement some
verification functions. The Pirate Party of Bavaria has decided at its
last General Assembly to re-write the delegation function of LQFB, so
we have to use another name for the fork as it must not be called
"Liquid Feedback" any more. So I'm not too optimistic%)

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://liquidfeedback.org/2012/09/17/liquidfeedback-entwickler-distanzieren-sich-vom-einsatz-ihrer-software-in-der-piratenpartei/

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Zbigniew Łukasiak <zzbbyy at gmail.com> wrote:
> In June I and my colleague sent by snail-mail  Contributor License
> Agreements, as described at
> http://www.public-software-group.org/contribute, to Public Software
> Group e. V.,   Johannisstr. 12,   10117 Berlin,   Germany - but we
> have never received any response from them.  We have a Polish
> translation and we would like it to be in the official repository.
>
> I've also tried to contact them at info2012 at public-software-group.org
> - but the result was also negative.
>
> I've heard the PP-DE is still using it - did they resign from the Open
> Source way of collaborating?
>
> --
> Zbigniew Lukasiak
> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general