[pp.int.general] Minutes of PPI GA 2013

[Loïc Grobol]

On 12 June 2013 14:51, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
> How conveniently formulated to be populistic and draw adhesion to your ad
> hominem argument :( .
>
> "Voting on them", as already said, refers to the whole election procedure as
> one single activity to participate in. The count of all the member parties
> participating at that single place and moment as had been conveniently
> announced to all that the election would take place (a for too many far and
> inaccessible Kazan, with a shitty last-minute effort to save it from
> disaster by the unannounced and ad-hoc organising of a very improvised
> remote hub in Brussels where finally more than half of all delegates shared
> a still to be improvised and untested remote connection that failed
> miserably to provide the minimum comfort necessary) is 16, as evidenced
> counting the columns in the published minutes.
>
> Thus, the votes needed to obtain +50% approval, standard votes or however
> anyone wants to name them is... not less than 9.
> Antonio.

What I fail to see from all I have read so far is why you think there
was a threshold of 50% approval. It is written 'simple majority',
which means 'more YES than NO'. If there were a 50% threshold it would
be 'absolute majority'. So what is actually your point?

LG

--
Loïc Grobol.