[pp.int.general] Transparency in the party

Anouk Neeteson jakobsheep at gmail.com
Fri Mar 1 10:42:02 CET 2013


Another limitation is the complexity or simplicity of the given
organisation. More layers = more complex.
And also the technology, compare a DOS-environment with one of the latest
GUI's is important. Like in LQFB I clearly miss a tree visualitation. It is
soooo boring D-base like.
On Mar 1, 2013 10:31 a.m., "Zbigniew Łukasiak" <zzbbyy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 1, 2013 7:14 a.m., "Zbigniew Łukasiak" <zzbbyy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can we stick to the subjects please?  There is another mail thread on
> >> M5S - please discuss it there - otherwise the party transparency
> >> insight will be lost in the avalanche of other subjects.
> >>
> >> I did not see any convincing arguments against full party transparency
> so
> >> far.
> >
> > Here starts the confusion over transparancy. Total transparancy in the
> > absolute (as stated) in any organisation is impossible without giving up
> > /all/ privacy of the involved individuals.
>
> OK - I agree - actually on this level of abstraction you can have
> arguments both sides - we need to get to more concrete examples.
>
> How about this - the party should publish all documents that is
> allowed by law (that is is not trespassing the privacy laws that for
> example require that party membership is secret), immediately upon
> receiving them or creating?
>
> This probably is untenable - because usually the party likes to write
> some comments on the documents before it gets to the press - so maybe
> one day of delay?
>
> What other limitations can you think up?
>
> --
> Z.
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20130301/c3eae35f/attachment.html>


More information about the pp.international.general mailing list