[pp.int.general] Invitation PPI Conference Paris 12th/13th of April
ningunotro at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 3 17:11:26 CEST 2014
... hasn't anybody noticed that the newly elected Court of Arbitration of the glorious and honourable PPI has made it's first reputable step already?
They have given themselves some kind of New Rules of Procedure...
... under which I could NOT file the complaint about Statutes Breaches anymore.
But they did MUCH BETTER... they decided these new ROP should VOID the complaint presented by me in 2012 that they have not been able to ditch otherwise because its presentation and argumentation was and still is BULLETPROOF.
The NEW ROP apply RETROACTIVELY, and allow them... IF WE AS PIRATES CONSENT TO THE ABUSE... to tell me that my complaint of 2012, filed in due process and correctly following the then applicable RULES OF PROCEDURE of the Court of Arbitration of the PPI... has been definitively shelved without evaluating its merits.
And dear Maxime Rouquet... has been paid his complicit silence with a chair on the board of PPEU, where he will continue to be ethically sound to the better advancement of the Pirate Movement.
Not to blame him exclusively... the pragmatic basterds are many.
The cheering kiddies are legion :(.
And the movements future right now is a BLACK HOLE.
I'm tired of cowards, I already said so once.
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:59:23 -0400
> From: ktetch at gmail.com
> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] Invitation PPI Conference Paris 12th/13th of April
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 4/3/2014 9:46 AM, Thijs Markus wrote:
>> Has such a 'concern' been sent to the CoA, or does someone still need to
>> copy paste the line: 'considering this GA was announced in breach of the
>> the statutes, it should be declared invalid under <copy paste statute
>> rule>.' at them?
> "at them", you mean the 'independent body' whose longest serving member
> is... Maxime, the event organiser? THAT independent body, unaware of
> THAT concern?
> uh huh.
> And certain people wonder why the PPI has such a stench of corruption
> around it.
> The quality of oversight by the "CoA" makes the Us house and Senate
> intelligence committee's oversight of the NSA seem fair, competent and
>> On 03.04.2014 15:37, Maxime Rouquet wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Lisa <lisa at piratenpartij.nl> wrote:
>>>> Has there been consensus on whether or not this is a formal GA?
>>> As far as I am concerned, formal GA or not, there will anyway be a PPI
>>> Conference and I do my best to organize it like a few others.
>>> About the concerns expressed, I have not changed my position : Members
>>> who feel there is a problem should ask the Court of Arbitration to
>>> rule on it. There is no shame in asking an independent body to
>>> arbitrate. Its job is also to solve such situations without ending in
>>> throwing stink bombs at each other on mailing-lists.
>>> PS : obviously, being either charged or a witness, I would not seat as
>>> a CoA member if there was such a ruling.
>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> - --
> Andrew Norton
> Tel: +1(352)6-KTETCH [+1-352-658-3824]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
More information about the pp.international.general