[pp.int.general] LQFB: status quo in Germany // was: liquid feedback papers and/or data?
felrobelv at gmail.com
Sun Apr 27 13:19:37 CEST 2014
I think I didn't explain it correctly, the novelty is that it supports
delegation and that the votes are encrypted. Not even the servers know what
is inside the votes, because to decipher and count the vote you *need* to
mix it with the other votes in a similar way as when you put your paper
ballot in the ballot box.
Liquid Feedback may support delegation but those votes are not encrypted
(in fact if I remember correctly the votes are public).
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Félix Robles <felrobelv at gmail.com> wrote:
> What the delegates/representatives vote is public, but who delegated in
> them is secret (no one knows, not even the servers). And it's universally
> verifiable that the counting of votes is done without tampering.
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Cal. <peppecal at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2014/04/27 Félix Robles <felrobelv at gmail.com>:
>> > because who else has an free software for voting that allows both
>> > delegation and secret vote at the same time? No one.
>> I need you to read what you just wrote.
>> Delegation AND secret voting? Does that mean I get to see what my
>> delegate votes (and that breaks secrecy) or that I do not get to see
>> what I voted (and that... is plain wrong)?
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pp.international.general