[pp.int.general] Antonio - do you want to work with us in organizing this movement?

[Andrianos Pappas]

Wtf, this is all stuff for personal correspondence and talks, not for international lists. 
So if you could all just stfu, and focus on real life things, such as #resetthenet, it'd be awesome. 

On June 5, 2014 7:53:03 PM EEST, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 18:36:18 +0200
>> From: zzbbyy at gmail.com
>> To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] Antonio - do you want to work with us
>in organizing this movement?
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Antonio Garcia
><ningunotro at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Jesus, can I talk to someone competent?
>> >
>> > Do I really have to spell everything out not to waste six months
>explaining
>> > the obvious?
>> >
>> > Can I take obvious things for obvious, or am I still talking in
>> > KinderGarten?
>> 
>> I can see you are very frustrated - but I don't quite understand what
>> you are referring to - sorry.
>> 
>> Are you disagreeing with me - or with someone else in this thread?
>> 
>> >
>> > I meant the FIRST ruling of the CoA ABOUT Pirates de Catalunya full
>> > membership, which is the subject WE were talking about. Not the
>first ever
>> > ruling of that particular class of Court of Arbitration.
>> >
>> 
>> OK - I was also talking about this case - so I guess that burst of
>> frustration was about something else.
>
>No, you weren't, damnit...
>
>"Right - the Court of Arbitration ruling was wrong.
> 
>But in fact the CoA could not rule that the very GA that elected them
>is invalid. The only ruling it could logically do is to rule that this
>is outside of its competence. And the current one also cannot nullify
>the chain of events that lead to its election - because it would also
>make itself invalid and thus also the very decision."
>
>
>That was about the supposition that the CoA can not rule as invalid the
>
>occasion at which it has been elected because then it would rule itself
>
>invalid. A very simplistic line of thought in itself that has however 
>nothing to do with the ruling about the catalans.
>
>Be more accurate, more inteligent, more competent. Or let somebody with
>
>more cualifications handle this.
>
>There is too much really basic stuff you do not seem to understand or
>even pay attention to. You are not being a good ambassador for the 
>Pirate cause.
> 
> 
>> > Thay one Court of Arbitration has proven to be absolutely
>incompetent, all
>> > the way, in even the most trivial of rulings.
>> >
>> > By the way, the spokesperson for the actual one is not showing much
>aptitude
>> > either, reading his comments:
>> >
>> >
>http://samedokan.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/when-pirates-do-prefer-censorship/
>> >
>> > And I am still kept waiting. Luckily, I reduced possible damage to
>a minimum
>> > as only Julia Reda got a seat in the European Parliament... results
>could
>> > have been far better if I had worked towards good results rather
>than
>> > against because nobody left me better options.
>> 
>> So you admit that you are working against pirate parties political
>success?
>
>You are a very bad craftsman trying to get a confession for the #Pirate
>#Inquisition :(.
>
>I have already said what I have said, and done what I have done.
>
> 
>> Cheers,
>> Z.
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> 		 	   		  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>____________________________________________________
>Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20140605/12a1145e/attachment-0001.html>