[pp.int.general] Communication Plan

[Jay Emerson]

Antonio Garcia.

Even if your attempt to slander turned out to be valid information I cannot
take anyone with a hotmail email seriously.

Again, send my regards to Mr. Norton and his handlers:
http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/gchq-biggest-trolls-nsa-edward-snowden-jtrig/

<3 Jay

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Of course, you CAN censor whatever you want... with GUTS ;)).
>
>
> Which you have not shown to have, up till now.
>
>
> https://samedokan.wordpress.com/2013/09/02/klarmachen-zum-kentern/
>
>
> https://samedokan.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/when-pirates-do-prefer-censorship/
>
>
> https://samedokan.wordpress.com/2016/05/20/can-doing-nothing-be-the-future-of-democracy/
>
>
> #PPIGA16 was still another fucking #pirate joke.
>
>
>
> Antonio.
> ------------------------------
> *De:* pp.international.general-bounces at lists.pirateweb.net <
> pp.international.general-bounces at lists.pirateweb.net> en nombre de
> Zbigniew Łukasiak <zzbbyy at gmail.com>
> *Enviado:* lunes, 1 de agosto de 2016 13:31:30
> *Para:* Pirate Parties International -- General Talk
> *Asunto:* [pp.int.general] Communication Plan
>
> From the yesterdays board meeting:
>
> """
> In order to improve communication, and overall visibility, an action
> plan needs to be developed. The present task is: - an open discussion
> regarding on the ways to improve the communication channels - a
> virtual workshop which aims to deliver a comprehensive communication
> plan as of next PPI Board meeting for review and acceptance. The
> communication plan will incorporate the feedback presented by Members
> during the GA as well as the outcome of several bilateral discussions.
> """
>
>
> http://wiki.pp-international.net/PPI_Minutes_2016_07_31#11_-_Communication_plan_draft
>
> Lets start the discussion.
>
>
> I have written many times at this mailing list that we need some kind
> of moderation - because the list in current state repels people. I
> have talked to many previously active participants in the discussions
> here - and not many of them still read the list. We need a way to
> improve the quality of the discussions here.
>
> It is not yet decided if we want to keep the mailing list or maybe if
> we want to move the discussions to a forum - but I think we can afford
> to have both.
>
> What I think is needed for the list:
>
> 1. More equal voice for all participants - so that it will not be
> possible that one user is flooding the list with emails. This can be
> done by restricting the amount of emails each participant can send to
> the list in a given time (for example to one daily or two weekly).
> This rule can be enforced automatically and it would be impartial.
> This will mean that we'll need some ways to guard against sockpuppets.
>
> 2. We need to encourage people to put some effort into writing the
> emails - so that they are written clearly and easy to understand.
> Again limiting the frequency of emails each user can send to the list
> should improve the situation in this regard as well. But it would
> probably be not enough. Maybe we need some guides - like
> http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html ? Or maybe we need to some out of
> the list feedback mechanism?
>
> 3. Maybe we'll need moderation (from time to time?) to weed out the
> extremely vicious. But this will be hard to do well. We'd need some
> concrete guidelines for the moderators, decide who will oversee the
> moderators etc. I have not seen anything really vicious at this
> mailing list so far - even Antonio would be bearable if he was limited
> to two emails a week - but this might change in the future if we make
> the list more popular.
>
>
> One note on rules and norms.
>
> We can guide/force people to act in a way we wish they do in three ways:
> - by limiting what they can do (by automatic enforcement - for example
> making the list server limit the amount of emails each email address
> can send to the list per a given time period)
> - by making rules - do what we want or otherwise we'll do something to
> you (if you troll the list the moderator can remove you from it)
> - by norms - which are like guidelines describing what we want you to
> do, but don't have any explicit enforcement mechanism
>
> Automatic enforcement is the most impartial, easiest to enforce and
> least flexible, norms are the least impartial, hardest to establish
> and enforce - but the most flexible, rules are somewhere in between.
>
> We'll probably need all three tools.
>
> Cheers,
> Zbigniew
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>


-- 
Jay Emerson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20160801/6cec6575/attachment-0001.html>