[pp.int.general] Why Members left

[Max Moritz Sievers]

Andreas Popp wrote:
> I think a lot of people here have a common opinion, that we should avoid
> extreme ideologies on any other point than our core topics.

Who defines what is normal and what is extreme? If we would live in anarchy 
every proposal to establish a state would be viewed as extreme.

> Many people here had the concern, that we could scare people away with this
> and ALOA also mentioned to find a middle way.

The middle way is almost always a bad decision. It lacks a "clear vision".

> For example "Full Taxation of flight fuel because of the defraudation of
> Flying companies compared to other traffic companies and the danger of
> building a general infranstructure monopoly."

Why should we generally oppose a general infranstructure monopoly? It is news 
to me that me do. Every motorised means of transport gets subsidized. We 
should form an opinion which one we want to subside to which amount. We can 
also restrict certain means of transport.

-- 
regards
Max Moritz Sievers