[pp.int.general] 3. Re: One good, one bad (Jerry Weyer)
Richard Stallman
rms at gnu.org
Fri Nov 6 05:36:03 CET 2009
> Even if that was adopted through a democratic procedure, it is
> undemocratic in nature.
Now we're talking esoterics?! What is more democratic than a text
adopted in a democratic procedure?
Whether a government system functions democratically is one question.
Whether it was adopted through a democratic system is a different question.
Do you see the difference?
My claim is that the EU pseudo-constitution's approval was carried out
under the various national democratic systems, but it reduces
democracy in Europe.
A political system which can make decision which are effectively
impossible for the people to reverse through the system is a system in
which democracy is weak or lacking. That's the case in Europe.
Decisions are already made at the EU level which the people never have
the power to undo.
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list