[pp.int.general] Telecoms package, ACTA and other monsters

[Félix Robles]

And is that explanation true?

And, anyway, if that explanation was true, why would they support a law that
allows the administration (A) the power to cut off internet without (B) the
authorization of a judge anyway? How is possible to determine to cut off or
not a internet connection without spying the communications? Have they
thought about that?


On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Christian Hufgard
<pp at christian-hufgard.de>wrote:

>
> Félix Robles wrote:
> > Well, I'm a simple member of the Spanish Pirate Party and we have already
> > stated that we are against on the Swedish Piratepartiet's stand on
> > theTelecoms Package. I'm not representing my whole party now (perhaps,
> > maybe, another person will be designated for that later) but *I
> personally
> > ask*:
> >
> > Why? *Why did the swedish Piratepartiet agree* with the Telecoms Package
> > when it allows* to cut off internet without the previous authorization of
> > a judge*? Can any swedish member of the Piratpartiet explain it??
>
> The official explanation is, that the EU has not the right to order the
> authorization of a judge...
>
>
>
> Christian
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20091106/7f0dd52e/attachment.htm>