[pp.int.general] Big Brother in NL?
Boris Turovskiy
tourovski at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 23:04:18 CET 2009
Reinier Bakels wrote:
> For cars, basically the idea is to make the pricing more honest, by
> taxing the *use* rather than the *posession* of a car. Any pricing
> scheme requires data collection, which is a privacy hazard.
Why? The system of counters for electricity which are then evaluated
etc. works pretty well, and the only data it collects is the amount
spent (for cars the equivalent would be the mileage). To fight
congestion there is the London system where you need a kind of ticket to
enter the city centre.
Yes, it's not as differentiated as a system that really tracks every
movement (and then calculates the fees based on some three-pages-long
formula, which is totally intransparent more often than not), but it
provides a rather fair balance between environment and privacy.
Best regards,
Boris
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list