[pp.int.general] PPNL needs to capitalize on this

[Rodrigo Pereira]

We reproduce this article from remixtures(
http://remixtures.com/2009/10/brein-acusada-de-apresentar-documentos-falsos-contra-o-pirate-bay-em-tribunal/)
(an  portuguese blog) in the PP-Brazil's news section:
http://partidopirata.org/node/183

We spreed this article by twitter and ident.ca.

Rodrix
http://www.partidopirata.org


2009/10/10 Błażej Kaczorowski <blazej.kaczorowski at gmail.com>

> Hello,
>
> I can say that we are still not 100% what happened in NL. There is no one
> consistent article with time table. Maybe more newspaper style like article.
> Its vary hard to translate blog post with a lot of individual referneces and
> personal thoughts. I am not saying it is not important - it valube source of
> information but int is hard for us to sell it to public - it is good for our
> onw purposes incide PP.
>
> Any has some more condence description of the case?
>
> BR,
> Blazej
> PP Poland
>
> 2009/10/9 Nicolas Sahlqvist <nicco77 at gmail.com>
>
> With "flood" I do not mean to send the same message several times (I mean
>> unique press releases to several newspapers at once) and I do not suggest
>> that one should change a working communication with the press. The
>> "flooding" may work for a country where press releases are not yet
>> established, but it does need some thought and adaption to each country and
>> there circumstances. It is of course preferred to use the country PP mail as
>> sender and hope that media is not flagging it as spam.
>> Besides having channels to communicate with old style press, there is of
>> course a point in having activists blogging, this worked very well in Sweden
>> where even portals such as live.piratpartiet.se proven to be a very
>> valuable source of information for members, press etc. This also gets
>> indexed by search engines so a search in Google etc. will catch peoples
>> (interested people that may become or already are members / activists for us
>> and press etc.) eye over time.
>>
>> I hope my message is more clear now.
>>
>>
>> - Nicolas
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Pasi Palmulehto <
>> scoffer at kofeiini.riippuvuus.net> wrote:
>>
>>> That wouldn't really be smart thing to do. Or I don't know what's your
>>> relationship to press in your country, but at least in Finland we have a
>>> good relationship with the press. They call me minimum once a week, they
>>> love to write and show us pretty much (more than every other
>>> not-in-the-parliament partys together, many times). Such actions would
>>> only destroy that relationship and we could be sure our press releases
>>> wouldn't carry so much articles as now. We post press releases once for
>>> all and have couple dozen press releases per year at the moment. We
>>> usually get attention just by sending them :)
>>>
>>> If there's no response for press release, you just need to suck it up
>>> and maybe try to bring it up somehow else. Most important is to keep
>>> sending the press releases, but I disagree on sending same PR more than
>>> once.
>>>
>>> Pasi "Scoffa" Palmulehto
>>> Leader of Finnish Pirate Party
>>>
>>> > Depends on the flood rate of course and who said one can not
>>> > distribute the "flooding" between countless e-mail addresses by using
>>> > many activists private e-mail's? This besides blogging where spam
>>> > filters are not applicable.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > - Nicolas
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:05 PM, np <np at planetarc.de> wrote:
>>> >         Nicolas Sahlqvist wrote:
>>> >         > (...) but after 100 or more
>>> >         > press releases maybe so do not get discouraged by there poor
>>> >         feedback, just
>>> >         > flood them until they start to listen!
>>> >         >
>>> >
>>> >         Imho flooding them with press-releases is the most efficient
>>> >         way to get
>>> >         your press email-address into everyones spam-filter...
>>> >
>>> >         ymc,
>>> >
>>> >            Nils Pipenbrinck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________
>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20091010/7c676748/attachment.htm>