[pp.int.general] How PPI should look like - our humble opinion

[W Tovey]

I hope some of the issues raised in this have been sorted out in the
final version of the statutes as approved earlier this evening or are
left to the secondary rules/guidelines such as the procedures for the
general assembly/conference. As I hope was made clear during the
discussions (and I apologies if it wasn't) the statutes agreed on today
are more the rough technicalities of how PPI operates, not the grand
ideals of the Pirate Movement, nor the exact details of the day-to-day
running of it. I did try to make sure that all concerns raised were
discussed and, if possible addressed.

I would expect that the first PPI Board voted tomorrow is able to work
with you (and all other Pirates and Parties) in ensuring PPI operates in
a way as close as possible to what we would like. Obviously, the best
way to make sure this happens would be to stand in the election; do this
by emailing me or the Coreteam with your name and the position(s) for
which you would like to stand by 8.30 CEST (6.30 GMT). If you are not
able to attend the conference (either in person or remotely) you might
also want to include some short comments as to why people should vote
for you.

The positions available are; Co-chairman, Chief Administrative Officer,
Treasurer and Board member.

-Will

On 17/04/2010 22:50, Justus Ršoemeth wrote:
> A bit late, isn't it? I mean there was a chance to work on the
> statutes online, and/or send a different proposal for statutes for
> months...
>
> And what exactly makes a country being spokesman better than a system
> that has an elected board not neccessarly from the national
> spokespersons? I think most pirate parties agree on the last point,
> but what exactly makes this proposal superior to the one that is being
> discussed at the conference at the moment? What parts of the one being
> discussed at the moment makes you feel uneasy as to the last point?
>
>
> On 17.04.10 18:01, Błażej Kaczorowski wrote:
>> What should PPI look like:
>> - conference at least once a year, delegates (or delegate) would
>> represent each county
>> - on each conference we elect country, that will be spokemen for
>> national parties untill next conference, though the constituent
>> parties will have the right to recall.
>> - once a month delegates (chosen by national parties) meets remotly
>> (IRC) and discuss interentional cases - amendments and ideas are
>> presented to boards in every country
>> - spokemen country can't make any binding decision without contact to
>> national parties boards (it can also call for immediet IRC gathering
>> to get proper confirmation)
>> - working groups will be ellected on confernece to perform maitenece
>> tasks untill next conference (webpage etc.)
>> - Funds will be given from member parties on a "need's be" basis, for
>> example money from parties to fund conference.
>> - All local parties commit to provide the financial means, within
>> their capablities and if needed, to make funding of the annual meeting
>> possible.
>> - We want to see PPI as a united federation of international Pirate
>> Parties, not a centralised global pirate party.
>>
>> http://wiki.partiapiratow.org.pl/index.php?title=Propozycja
>>
>> Blazej and Robert from Poland
>>
>> Tess and Ella from Sweden
>>
>> Andrew from UK
>>
>> Monika nad Jurgen from Belgum
>>
>> Christian from Romania
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>>
>>    
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general