[pp.int.general] Technical Reasons not to meet in Brazil

[Thomas Burke]

Ok I would just like to ask that we please stop this kind of stuff.
All the arguing over what "went wrong" or where would be the "best"
place to have the next conference is a little pointless at this time.
Until we are ready to plan for the next conference (Which wont be
happening for a long time yet unless we call an EGA) we have more
important issues to cover. We each have homegrown problems to discuss
and of course we also have the acta issue which is ever present. Lets
just leave all the rest for now and deal with the things that are
going to have a profound affect on us now.

- Thomas

On 23 April 2010 15:22, Kenneth Peiruza <kenneth at contralaguerra.org> wrote:
> Rodrigo/Jorge,
>
> En/na Rodrigo Pereira ha escrit:
>>
>>    I would never vote to make a remote conference in India, Vietnam,
>> Cambodja, Thailand or even Singapore for European people, as pings are
>> never below 300 ms and usually around 400-500ms. Now, after my tests, I
>> would also don't vote Brazil until it gets better Internet
>> communicacions with Europe, as previously said.
>
> This is irrelevant because we are not discussing conference projects, this
> is just an invitation.
>
> Then your invitation is also irrelevant, isn't it?
>
> Using a good hardware and a good compression, and one of our icecast2
> servers in Sweden, I think we can do a very good streaming. Please do not
> disqualify an invitation using a technical justification. That does not
> change the value of the invitation. And this is unnecessary.
>
> Cross-continental delay in  communications  has little to do with your
> hardware (unless  using SatCom), so, you are (again) wrong.
>
> An invitation must be checked in all aspects: easiness/affordability of
> traveling to that place as well as granting a decent remote participation.
> If some point fails, the invitation weakens.
>
> Unnecessary is blaming other people, crying to get cash back when some
> people donated for you and a lot more lost personal cash. Unnecessary is
> telling others that they have prejudices when they reply/answer/comment on
> something you don't like.
>
> Sorry, Brazil might be a nice country but it's not the place for a low
> budget congress with remote delegates using VoIP, as VoIP will be CRAPPY for
> 5/6 of delegates. That is a fact. Without VoIP, any remote delegate will
> feel impotent, as it happened last time.
>
> It would also be a bad place because of people like you two, but this is a
> personal opinion, not a fact.
>
> Is that a prejudice or you simply want it and don't accept any FACT against
> it? Stop blaming other people saying they have prejudices just because we
> don't share your points.
>
>
> Grow up, you are the ones with prejudices.
>
>
> Rodrigo.
>
> Kenneth
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>



-- 
******************************************

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.

******************************************