[pp.int.general] Pirate support for Wikileaks
Jay Emerson
jemers2 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 18:21:45 CET 2010
Anybody notice how effective of a tool this distraction of an issue has
become in taking attention away from the fact this is the biggest government
leak since the Pentagon Papers?
Look at the contents, not the messenger, kthnxbai.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Justus Römeth <squig at dfpx.de> wrote:
> Even if he committed that crime (according to Amelia it is alleged rape,
> which in Sweden also includes not stopping sex when the condom breaks),
> would that make all of wikileaks all of a sudden criminal?
>
>
> On 06.12.10 09:38, Aftermath wrote:
>
>> Also, I am not trying to spread Anti-Wikileak rubble or anything like
>> that. It's just that there's a lot of un-answered questions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Julian Assange is currently wanted by interpol for an alledged sex crime:
>>
>>
>> http://www.interpol.int/public/data/wanted/notices/data/2010/86/2010_52486.asp
>>
>>
>> Could it be a smear campaign by his enemies? Yes it could. If true
>> then we're talking about conspiratorial theory here.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, boboniboni boboniboni
>> <boboniboni at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That is why I would say Assange is being very altruistic in this,
>>> maybe he is a real human hero. The future will tell.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jay Emerson<jemers2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We just offered our website (www.nypirates.org) to the cause of Mass
>>>> Mirroring Wikileaks. As an activist, I have to say that the amount of
>>>> heat
>>>> Assange knew he would get for something like this HAS to be altruistic
>>>> seeing as you're automatically in fear of your life from essentially
>>>> every
>>>> NATO ally state. A million dollars but the minute I spend it I could be
>>>> capped by the CIA after being tailed? I call "bullshit" on Aftermath,
>>>> respectfully :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:33 PM, boboniboni boboniboni<
>>>> boboniboni at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is Assange supposed to live a life based on hard altruism? I think a
>>>>> reasonable and quick scientific analysis about human behavior will say
>>>>> that every human being runs on mutualistic shared goals (rational
>>>>> egoism) with a variable amount of altruism.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would find it surprising and pathological IF Assange was allegedly
>>>>> doing this under a radical notion of metaphysical hard altruism.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Aftermath<aftermath.thegreat at gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wikileaks does what it does for Profit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I say this because julian assange is the only one who has access to
>>>>>> the paypal donation account.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one knows how much is donated except for him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wikileaks likes transparency for everyone except themselves.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cryptome is way cooler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas Sahlqvist<nicco77 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Forgot the link to Wikipedia:
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juma_Khan_Hamdard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Nicolas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Nicolas Sahlqvist<nicco77 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mixing the organisation Wikileaks with the assault charge of Assange
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> not the best of ideas and treating it differently could indicate
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> don't really believe in the principle of innocent until proven
>>>>>>>> guilty..
>>>>>>>> I tend to think it is important to make a statement in support for
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> work Wikileaks does at the moment considering how it is threatened.
>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>> mention other organisations that works on similar goals as you
>>>>>>>> mention, but
>>>>>>>> that part of the message would probably not be noticed when all
>>>>>>>> media
>>>>>>>> talks
>>>>>>>> about is Wikileaks.
>>>>>>>> There are also other ways to support leaks, by actively spreading
>>>>>>>> leaks on
>>>>>>>> the net. I seem to have this new hobby of reading SECRET cables from
>>>>>>>> Wikileaks and the corrupt governor (Juma Khan Hamdard) of the Paktia
>>>>>>>> province in Afghanistan caught my attention so I updated his
>>>>>>>> Wikipedia
>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>> with the following sentences:
>>>>>>>> "In May 2007 he was forced to resign as governor of Jowzjan when
>>>>>>>> thousands
>>>>>>>> demonstrated against him. Forces under his command shot at
>>>>>>>> demonstrators in
>>>>>>>> the Uzbek town of Shibirghan, killing thirteen and injuring more
>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>> thirty."
>>>>>>>> "He is currently under investigations for soliciting bribes from
>>>>>>>> contractors by having them arrested at job sites and held until the
>>>>>>>> bribes
>>>>>>>> were paid"
>>>>>>>> And referenced to the Guardian quoting the cable from Wikileaks:
>>>>>>>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/241681
>>>>>>>> I have to say that it was a very satisfactory to save those changes!
>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Nicolas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Amelia Andersdotter
>>>>>>>> <teirdes at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4 December 2010 19:03, Erik Lönroth<erik.lonroth at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ... and would you support something that adds a few words about
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> "whistle-blowers" ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If anything should be supported it's whistle-blowers. And it is
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> position as a Swedish Pirate Party member and an incumbent Member
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> European Parliament not to support a text that blindly supports
>>>>>>>>> the,
>>>>>>>>> eh.
>>>>>>>>> Defendant or plaintiff? Defendant I guess, in a case that has not
>>>>>>>>> even gone
>>>>>>>>> to court. Technically, there can't even be defendant or plaintiffs
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> case because they are only conducting a preliminary investigation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gosh, people are really sheep when they fall for media
>>>>>>>>> manipulation,
>>>>>>>>> aren't they?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /a
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I removed that from my original text. I would not mind adding it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /Erik
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Erik Lönroth
>>>>>>>>>> <erik.lonroth at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Amelia, is it your position as a representative of the Pirate
>>>>>>>>>>> Party in
>>>>>>>>>>> Sweden and (soon) Member of the European Parliament not to
>>>>>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>>>>>> this text?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://openpad.me/m9av1kOVgs
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /Erik
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Amelia Andersdotter
>>>>>>>>>>> <teirdes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4 December 2010 12:17, Mikulas.Ferjencik
>>>>>>>>>>>> <Mikulas.Ferjencik at seznam.cz>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to note, that PPI is not supposed to issue Press
>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is more appropriate to prepare a press release, which can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate PPs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> endorse. It would also be good to include what do respective
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PPs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> support wikileaks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Swedish Pirate Party and myself do not support Wikileaks as
>>>>>>>>>>>> such,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> leaking and leaking services in general (including OpenLeaks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> cryptome and
>>>>>>>>>>>> the newly formed Serbian project for leaks). We would like to
>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>> inclusive statement that considers the benefit over
>>>>>>>>>>>> whistleblowers in
>>>>>>>>>>>> general, and not a specific service for this purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikileaks can certainly be exemplified, but it is important that
>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>> do not
>>>>>>>>>>>> get to represent the entire leaking community, and especially
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> they do
>>>>>>>>>>>> not overshadow the brave men and women who make sure the leaks
>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>> out there
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the first place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Amelia Andersdotter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>>>>>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>>>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jay Emerson
>>>> Administrative Officer
>>>> New York Pirate Party
>>>>
>>>> "My user has information that could...that could make this a free system
>>>> again! No, really! You'd have programs lined up just to use this place,
>>>> and
>>>> no MCP looking over your shoulder." - Tron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________
>>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
--
Jay Emerson
Administrative Officer
New York Pirate Party
"My user has information that could...that could make this a free system
again! No, really! You'd have programs lined up just to use this place, and
no MCP looking over your shoulder." - Tron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20101206/5713ea8d/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list