[pp.int.general] PPI GA Prague / Video Conference System for remote delegates

[Pat Mächler]

No probs; I assumed most of what you wrote ;-)
Also I'm sorry if my previous response was probably be a bit harsh in tone.
But I felt that I was in a situation where I had to make it very clear
to everyone that concerning the question if there is only one system
or if there need to be several is a decision which I can't sanely
delegate to anyone else, but which is primary up to the member
delegates (as they need to bear with it), and second to the PPI board
members (as we have the responsibility by election by all member).
As said: I'm very happy and really grateful for all the effort
(including this discussion) you invested and invest in Pirate
streaming and also in researching possible solutions for remote
participation. I could write more, but then it would probably become
pathetic; just be assured that I'm *really* grateful ;)

-pat

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Wolfgang Preiss <w.preiss at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 30.12.2011 11:34, schrieb Pat Maechler aka Valio:
>
>> I'm sorry that I have to interfere here and comment on that, Wolfgang.
>> But as one of the board members appointed responsible for the GA I
>> simply have to, in order not to create more havoc.
>
>
> Hello Pat,
>
> I am sorry if I left the impression, that I somehow would interfere with
> decisions which aren't my responsibility This was not my goal, and I
> appologize for this now and here formally.
>
> However, I have stated, that I _suggest_ possible solutions to the
> responsible persons. I quote myself here:
>
>
>> This will be/was suggested to the responsible PPI Board members, and the
>> remote delegates, and we will see if this gets accepted.
>
>
> Again, I am sorry if I left a wrong impression. Of course all scenarios I
> draw only will be suggestions. I am not the one to decide. I simply wanted
> to state technical possibilites.
>
> Noone is questioning your position.
>
> I am extremly sorry, that I haven't stated more clear that I only _suggest_
> possible solutions.
>
> Even in my last mail I stated:
>
>
>> I would like to add a detail to my concept described earlier:
>>
>> The moderator should be equipped with an cell phone for emergency calls -
>> eg breakdown of the software/connection/whatever. Every remote deligate will
>> be handed the international phone number of that phone, enabling to call
>> during the conference if any technical difficulty occours which keeps the
>> deligate from participating the way he is supposed to do so.
>
>
> The term I used is "should" and "detail to my concept" - I did not say it
> will be done so.
>
> A concept is a possible plan. Not a ready solution.
>
> Again I apologize. I will not present any suggestions in public and leave it
> of course to you to decide what details you want to discuss in public.
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general