[pp.int.general] About the situation in Spain
Brendan Molloy
brendan.molloy at pirateparty.org.au
Wed Apr 4 13:29:59 CEST 2012
I would recommend that any party or member of any party that feels PPES
is acting against the spirit of the Pirate movement that they place a
formal motion to have PPES's membership suspending pending investigation
by the CoA.
I'm tired of hearing about the bullshit. It's time someone puts in a
formal complaint and it is dealt with in a proper and formal manner.
Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
> If you are still a member, I can't understand why you don't have right
> to voice and vote ....
>
> This "not all members have right to vote in PP-ES" it's a bit shy...
> (the famous "census" stuff).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kenneth
>
> Al 04/04/12 12:51, En/na David Arcos ha escrit:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will just confirm that this voting exists.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Choms <choms at botmania.net
>> <mailto:choms at botmania.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just wanted to add that, due this email, and other fake
>> accusations, PP-ES is voting to expel me.
>>
>> You can read the full list of accusations and my response to all
>> them (sorry, it's in spanish) here: http://pastebin.com/KGmgy0dE
>>
>> The ballot is exactly the same but without my responses, and I
>> have no right on reply nor vote
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> El 23 de marzo de 2012 15:14, Choms <choms at botmania.net
>> <mailto:choms at botmania.net>> escribió:
>>
>> This is a short report about the situation on PP-ES:
>>
>> Our CoA have been "voting" a resolution about the former board
>> and several infractions they did for four weeks. Those
>> infractions include that the former secretary and the former
>> CTO kidnapped the former treasurer mail account, the party's
>> paypal account and even deleted all secretary account emails,
>> which were proof of an illegal drop of aprox 450 affiliates.
>>
>> Now all our CoA have been resigned, and there are new illegal
>> CoA elections who break 3 entire articles of our statutes
>> (art. 19.c, 13.c, and 20.b). The former secretary who is
>> charged of all I've mentioned above is postulated as CoA
>> president. One of our affiliated just disputed this election
>> based on above articles plus 7.4 and 8.2, and solicited the
>> convocation of a new extraordinary assembly of the party.
>>
>> Have been raised a motion of censure against Daniel Riaño,
>> actual president of Madrid territorial (and member of the
>> party's board) because several "strong language" against other
>> members of the party, members of the Madrid board and members
>> and work of the CoA. After that, he even showed power abuse on
>> the last Madrid assembly, using him status as president to
>> take back some decisions he didn't wanted, using a law that
>> himself broke when he got the charge (Administrative Procedure
>> Act, which doesn't allow to set board members at show of hands
>> which is the way he get the charge with 7 in favor and 4
>> against it, of 60's Madrid's members). After that he even
>> refused on an aggressive manner to end the assembly just to
>> say "I am the president and nothing gets up until I tell"
>> (I've tried to be as accurate as possible on the translation)
>> in front of 6 people.
>>
>> For this motion of censure the party is using a tool made by
>> the former CTO who helped the former secretary on all (and
>> more things) I've mentioned on first point. This tool have a
>> little inconvenient, for it's creator and some members of the
>> party nothing important, that is that any administrator can
>> vote as any affiliate, all ballots are served on plain text
>> via administrator's interface. IMHO this is a serious security
>> issue, any admin can vote as any affiliate and there is no way
>> to check what voted who (obviously), and even change the
>> ballots order to get people voting one option while they think
>> they are voting another. The creator of this tool, who refuses
>> to fix the bug, justified telling me that "you can also change
>> the results on the DB, it's more easy". Several admins are
>> implicated directly on what is voting. It's planned to use
>> this tool to vote the new CoA.
>>
>> Actual secretary, against my advice, deleted several proofs of
>> Data Protection Act violation, in response to that I told him
>> that was negligent (concretely I told him that he was crazy
>> for deleting that), and now he used that email to justify my
>> expulsion as actual CTO of PP-ES, removing my access and
>> making it impossible to retrieve any data or proof of law
>> violation, data which I was giving to the (now former) CoA
>> (always respecting all points included on Spanish Data
>> Protection Act) to allow them to investigate all
>> irregularities and penal illegalities.
>>
>> This is, broadly, the situation of PP-ES, it can be defined
>> (from an affiliate point of view) as impotence and frustration
>> in face of the situation.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Choms.
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> <mailto:pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net>
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
--
Regards,
Brendan Molloy
Secretary
Pirate Party Australia
M: +61 449 617 246
W: http://www.pirateparty.org.au
E: brendan.molloy at pirateparty.org.au
T: @piecritic
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list