[pp.int.general] Other (no sot good) reaction to MU joint complaint campaign

[Justus Römeth]

The thing is, Christian, nobody is defending Megaupload.

As I wrote in the other email, of course it is possible to say that people
using filelockers without backups are very stupid, especially so in the
case of MU. That doesn't mean that frighting for those customers' rights
should be confused with defending MU, that's a waste of time we should nopt
bother with in intra- and interparty communications.

cheers
-J

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Christian Hufgard
<pp at christian-hufgard.de>wrote:

> On 27.01.2012 17:33, Dario wrote:
>
> > If you want tl;dr, here it goes: she just blame our name (Pirate) and she
> > childishly assumes, that all pirates (from Pirate Party) are thieves who
> > want to pay nothing. Classic.
>
> Well, that's the natural reaction if you defend a company like
> MegaUpload. You can close your eyes as hard as you want, their business
> modell is based upon earning money by selling other people's work
> without permission.
>
> The approach to focus on the user's that mght have had legal content
> there is a good idea. But if you buy at a known fence, it's your risk if
> you get harmed too. There are much better ways for legal hosting than
> MegaUpload.
>
> Christian
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120127/052ad7e4/attachment.html>