[pp.int.general] Other (no sot good) reaction to MU joint complaint campaign

[Josep Sànchez]

On 29/01/12 11:14, Christian Hufgard wrote:
> On 29.01.2012 11:00, Josep Sànchez wrote:
>> On 29/01/12 08:53, Christian Hufgard wrote:
>>>> I think the one you use is not an enough similar example: what you say
>>>> is that you have your car in the garage, waiting to be repaired, and the
>>>> feds destroy it with any need to do it, just because it's inside. Big
>>>> difference, isn't it?
>>>
>>> In that case I hope, you made a backup copy of your car before leaving
>>> in the shop... :)
>>
>> I might, or I might not. If I haven't, I will be really, really stupid
>> but stupidity it's not illegal in Spain.(just take a look at our
>> governments...)
>
> And it's not the goverments duty to defend stupid people for data loss,
> is it?

I have never said that.

  You are also allowed to lose your money by investing in criminal
> stock companies.

That's not the actual situation. In my country when anybody does any 
action it is responsible for the collateral damages it might cause, and 
it's even more serious if they could have avoided or previewed them and 
didn't do it. It doesn't matter if its an individual, a government 
officer or a policeman.
Are laws different in your country and in the USA?

MU was not a "criminal company" *until* Virginia State authorities told 
the Feds to seize it. People could hire their services until that moment 
as they could do with any other company in the net. Financial services, 
ISP's and even US tax authorities were operating normally with MU. Are 
they also criminals?.

>> I imagine the Feds have seized MU's bank accounts simultaneously, more
>> or less, to the detention of Schmitz and his co-workers, and I guess
>> that the amount of money should be fairly enough (was or not MU a big
>> profit company thanks to illegal activities?) to continue operations a
>> fair time to remove illegal stuff and let legal user to recover their
>> files.
>>
>> *Everybody* has it's responsability, even Feds, Virginia State
>> authorities or whoever is behind this.
>
> Well, that's your point of view. I don't think the Feds or Virginia
> State are responsible to keep MU running. And if the court determines
> the raid was illegal, they gonna have to pay a pretty huge amount of
> money to Kim and his fellows.

First was a matter of money, now of who has to run the service, what 
next? :)

Cheers.