[pp.int.general] CONSENSUS
Loïc Grobol
loic.grobol at gmail.com
Fri Jul 13 13:12:37 CEST 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 13 Jul 2012 13:06:01 CEST, Anouk Neeteson wrote:
> I'm for concensus because this is the ONLY way to guaranty protection from
> the abuse of a majority against a minority or even a single person.
Following this line of thought, wouldn't absolute consensus requirement
be an abuse of the majority by every minority? I mean, it gives every
single person the power to block any action, regardless of urgency. See
what consensus did to the EU, or what it does in the NATO security council.
L.
- --
Loïc Grobol,
France, European Union
Parti Pirate (FR), Europe Écologie Les Verts
PP-EU Program group, PPI TTF, Pirate Times
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iJwEAQECAAYFAlAAAp4ACgkQgMPkEfO8tQIE3AQArWPOm8W6qH4M1cjmy5TldtKj
+92loL2rTeykUeiaS5Uk8rY5olPufzOkc+26DCWXDGiKt5Ynd3MDkawtTnkcQLxI
W7jksVrF1Xwq6twEN1PR9tK5N+bVlK7NLiXZlb3cgRlT7aKZE9Ixgg/Z3h65M/BW
pP7rm8ROCx9zfbnZkAY=
=3tjX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list