[pp.int.general] CONSENSUS

[Justus Römeth]

Or the UN security council, if you only look at the 5 veto powers.

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Loïc Grobol <loic.grobol at gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri 13 Jul 2012 13:06:01 CEST, Anouk Neeteson wrote:
> > I'm for concensus because this is the ONLY way to guaranty protection
> from
> > the abuse of a majority against a minority or even a single person.
> Following this line of thought, wouldn't absolute consensus requirement
> be an abuse of the majority by every minority? I mean, it gives every
> single person the power to block any action, regardless of urgency. See
> what consensus did to the EU, or what it does in the NATO security council.
>
> L.
>
> - --
> Loïc Grobol,
> France, European Union
> Parti Pirate (FR), Europe Écologie Les Verts
> PP-EU Program group, PPI TTF, Pirate Times
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iJwEAQECAAYFAlAAAp4ACgkQgMPkEfO8tQIE3AQArWPOm8W6qH4M1cjmy5TldtKj
> +92loL2rTeykUeiaS5Uk8rY5olPufzOkc+26DCWXDGiKt5Ynd3MDkawtTnkcQLxI
> W7jksVrF1Xwq6twEN1PR9tK5N+bVlK7NLiXZlb3cgRlT7aKZE9Ixgg/Z3h65M/BW
> pP7rm8ROCx9zfbnZkAY=
> =3tjX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120713/6733fd90/attachment.html>