[pp.int.general] PPI board meeting minutes and some updates about the conference.

[Isabel Fernández]

Hello Justus,

We don't think PPI's job regulate between pirates parties either. That's
why we said we'll declare nothing of the sort.

Our suggestion was based on the premise 'one legal territorial pirate
party - one vote' that we think it's a more fair than the actual
situation. We think PPI could give it some thought to this issue.

We'd love to send a delegate to the GA, but rumours are saing that we'll
face elections next autumn at Galician Parlament and still there's a lot
work to do... we're not sure we can attend to Prague. Generally rumours
on this subject turn out to be true at the end. Maybe next time we are
able to send Galician Delegation.



Kind Regards,

Isabel Fernandez.


On 03/03/12 10:51, Justus Römeth wrote:
> Thank you Isabel (and the rest of PP-GAL),
> 
> I don't think PPI's job is to regulate between individual pirate parties,
> but rather to keep the movement growing, by providing infrastructure and a
> place to meet for pirates who's country does not have a PP, and by helping
> them through the early stages of forming a party. Therefore I don't think a
> model that would give PPDE ~20 times as much voting power as the next
> biggest party (PPSE is still not a member) would be appropriate.
> 
> That is not to say that the current model of PPI concerning the situation
> in Spain is optimal. It is not. I think your proposed solution would make
> sense for something like PPEU, or a PPI with a much broadened scope (as
> well as institutions like the EP, but that is a different matter). As of
> yet I don't see the latter happening, however.
> 
> Are you (PP-GAL) planning to send a delegate to the General assembly in
> Prague?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Justus
> 
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:09 AM, HerNenya <isabel.fdez at mundo-r.com> wrote:
> 
>> I do apologize since last message was my first mail to this list. I'm
>> not used to deal w/ digests.
>>
>> I repeat the message for better reading.
>>
>> Best Regards to all,
>>
>>
>> Isabel Fernandez.
>> -----------------------------------------------
>>
>> This is a message made by the members of public relations team for
>> PP-GAL. It is agreed by all the members of mentioned team and we want to
>> send it through our link in this mailing list of PPI members so it must
>> be understood in the name of PP-GAL party and not from the sender who
>> forwards this message.
>>
>> Since there were direct references to PP-GAL in this list and the way we
>> organize ourselves in Spain, we consider it is important to be heard in
>> our oppinion before of the rest of pirates parties of the world.
>>
>> First of all, we would like to say we are 2 months old as a political
>> party in Spain and our foundation is based on the structure of Spain as
>> a country formed by autonomies as such established in the Spanish
>> Constitution Act [1] in article #148 in order to organize ourselves in
>> the Spaniard territory. Moreover we have our own idiosyncrasy as
>> language and culture quite different from other spaniard territories.
>> Therefore we are an approved political party by the competent Ministry
>> with same rights and duties as PP-ES and PP-CAT.
>>
>> As Kenneth from PP-CAT said in other previous message, we are
>> encouraging a confederation at country level to organize common tasks
>> that affect us as a nation such the cases of #megacomplaint and
>> #opColapso (fighting against Sinde-Wert law [2]) that we are supporting
>> PP-ES, PP-CAT and PP-GAL. Last week we have created a mailing list
>> called pirata-34 to discuss those affairs.
>>
>> Regarding the subject about who can vote as a country or by the amount
>> of pirate members, we consider system of countries is not fair precisely
>> because of proportion of the population densities and pirates members. A
>> possible fair solution (as a suggestion) to this matter could be that
>> depending on the number of members from each pirate party, each party
>> will provide a proportional amount of the contingency fund of PPI, as
>> well, each party would have the proportional weight in PPI decisions.
>>
>> Refering to mentions about how to organize internally the different
>> pirate parties in Spain, we considered that this mailing list is not the
>> appropiate place to discuss about it, so we are not going to declare
>> anything here.
>>
>> [1] http://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/IDIOMAS/9/Espana/LeyFundamental/index.htm
>> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ley_Sinde
>>
>>
>> Public Relations Team of PP-GAL.
>> http://piratasdegalicia.org/web/
>>
>> --
>> Isabel Fdez
>> GPG EA63DF8E
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general


-- 
Isabel Fdez.
EA63DF8E

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120304/22881463/attachment.pgp>