[pp.int.general] Are there "good" and "wrong" Rigths?

[Dario]

El 28 de marzo de 2012 11:24, Eduardo Perdices <edupergar at gmail.com>escribió:

>
> what if after direct democracy results are 50%-50%?, shouldn't the
> political organization keep neutral in that matter?.
>
> Or even if results are 60%-40%, should it keep neutral or defend the 60%
> and ignore the other 40%?.
>
>
You have different options:

   - Be neutral.
   - You need debate a bit more and vote again with new "proofs".
   - Take part on the majority side and acknowledge the opposing view and
   create more (sane) debate.

It is better to debate than to have an etched in stone point of view ;) We
must avoid pre-cooked ideology packs and tend to ideology frameworks,
enough flexible to adapt to current socio-economic context.

-- 
Dario Castañé
http://www.dario.im | http://twitter.com/im_dario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120328/2f55ce4e/attachment.html>