[pp.int.general] Are there "good" and "wrong" Rigths?

[Jens Seipenbusch]

Am 29.03.2012 12:09, schrieb mattias.bjarnemalm at piratpartiet.se:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:29:34 +0200, Dario <i at dario.im> wrote:
>> El 29 de marzo de 2012 11:11, Maxime Rouquet
>> <maxime.rouquet at partipirate.org
>>> On 03/29/2012 10:49 AM, Dario wrote:
>>> Article 27. (2) :
>>> "Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material
>>> interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic
> production
>>> of which he is the author."
>>>
>>>
>> Moral rights are, generally, the right of
>> attribution<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_%28copyright%29>,
>> the right to have a work published
>> anonymously<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymity>or
>> pseudonymously <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudonym>, and the right
> to
>> the integrity of the work. The first and the former are recognized in
>> Creative Commons licenses.
> Trying to profit from material interests is not missuse. It is to use that
> material interest. There is no way around the fact that the line "the right
> to the protection of the [...] material interests resulting from any
> scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author" is
> in direct conflict with the core of the IPR critique within the Pirate
> movement.
>
> This does not hinder us from supporting HR in general. But we should
> always avoid referring to the udhr or any other UN document when arguing
> for HR.
>
>
>> Anyway, in my opinion, pirates are against the misuse of all this
>> terminology for profit, the intermediaries who exploit (almost
> literally)
>> creators and using them as ram against freedom (censorship, data
> retention,
>> etc), which are related with material interests.
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general