[pp.int.general] Board meeting protocols of Pirate Parties

[Eduardo Perdices]

Hi,

the second article states:

"2. Sólo con el consentimiento expreso y por escrito del afectado podrán
ser objeto de tratamiento los datos de carácter personal que revelen la
ideología, afiliación sindical, religión y creencias."

what means that to reveal the ideology of a person, he needs to express his
written consent to publish that information.

The only way to keep it public is leaving their names out, or using
acronyms (K.P. instead of Kenneth Peiruza). Piratas de Galicia does the
first one:

"O actual tesoureiro _NON_PUBLICADO_ atópase ocupado e non ten tempo para
levar as funcións de tesoureiría. _NON_PUBLICADO_ ofreceuse para levar a
tesourería. Vótase o cambio e apróbase por unanimidade."

Translation: "The current treasurer _NO_PUBLISHED_ is busy and has no time
to ....."

I guess Pirata.CAT can do the same, but they would need to change it.

Regards.

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Kenneth, thanks for the quick reply. Ans as always, an answer gives
> another question. The sanctions mentioned in Artículo 45 are only for
> those that enforce 'confession', it does NOT state:" It's is strictly
> forbidden to reveal the ideology of a person." But it would be like:
> "It is strictly forbidden to enforce to have someone reveal his/her
> ideologie." So I don not understand the argumentation NOT to share the
> general assembly's minutes because of the LOPD.
> In the Netherlands if someone does not want to have their name
> published, they got a pseudonym for that purpose. Why don't you do it
> the same way in Catalonia? Especially since it is so essential for the
> transparency as you claim to support.
>
> Anouk Neeteson
> member international coordination Belgium and the Netherlands.
> (proposing an international coordination team in France next AG in
> Montreuil)
>
>
> On 7 October 2012 09:23, Dario <dario at pirata.cat> wrote:
> > 2012/10/7 Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Hi Kenneth, can you give me the precise text in the Spanish LOPD ? I
> >> am very curious how it states / defines:  " It's is strictly forbidden
> >> to reveal the ideology of a person." ? And I can not find it, but
> >> again my Spanish is really bad :)
> >
> >
> > http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t2.html#a7
> >
> >> Artículo 7. Datos especialmente protegidos.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 1. De acuerdo con lo establecido en el apartado 2 del artículo 16 de la
> >> Constitución, nadie podrá ser obligado a declarar sobre su ideología,
> >> religión o creencias.
> >
> >
> > Quick translation:
> >
> >> Article 7. Sensitive data.
> >> 1. By Constitution, nobody can be forced to tell about their ideology,
> >> religion or beliefs.
> >
> >
> > And the fine for doing something like publishing the political
> affiliation
> > of people is stated here:
> > http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t7.html#a45"Only"
> > between 300.000 and 600.000€.
> >
> > --
> > Dario Castañé
> > http://www.dario.im | http://twitter.com/im_dario
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> >
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20121007/e8a54e6c/attachment-0001.html>