[pp.int.general] Board meeting protocols of Pirate Parties

[Kenneth Peiruza]

Exactly, and we have 12 GA briefs to be editted. It has been approved
weeks ago, but it isn't a priority task.

This september we faced:
- PPEU meeting: 1-2 September
- Legal initiative to stop mortgage evictions: 5 September
- Parents2Parents: a joint campaign btw PP-GAL/CAT/Madrid. It's a page
to share textbooks for schools and universities (17 September).
http://pirata.cat/p2p it has been a complete media success. we got +1400
likes in facebook and almost 200 new followers in twitter and 200 in fb
+ 700 more for PP-Madrid and PP-Galicia
- Election advancement (2 years), in September 25th we knew that we'll
be facing elections in 25th of November, in all Catalonia. We're busy
doing campaign stuff. You just faced one campaign, so I guess you can
understand that the campaign is our main duty right now.


So, as I stated, we'll try to publish them in January, but it is not a
priority task, as all board minutes are publicly accessibly and all
assembly decisions are publicly available through our e-democracy
platform: https://xifrat.pirata.cat

Then, are they so important? in our GA's we don't usually decide
anything, as we do always prefer to use our e-democracy platform to let
all members decide.


Best regards,

Kenneth

Al 07/10/12 11:52, En/na Eduardo Perdices ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> the second article states:
>
> "2. Sólo con el consentimiento expreso y por escrito del afectado
> podrán ser objeto de tratamiento los datos de carácter personal que
> revelen la ideología, afiliación sindical, religión y creencias."
>
> what means that to reveal the ideology of a person, he needs to
> express his written consent to publish that information.
>
> The only way to keep it public is leaving their names out, or using
> acronyms (K.P. instead of Kenneth Peiruza). Piratas de Galicia does
> the first one:
>
> "O actual tesoureiro _NON_PUBLICADO_ atópase ocupado e non ten tempo
> para levar as funcións de tesoureiría. _NON_PUBLICADO_ ofreceuse para
> levar a tesourería. Vótase o cambio e apróbase por unanimidade."
>
> Translation: "The current treasurer _NO_PUBLISHED_ is busy and has no
> time to ....."
>
> I guess Pirata.CAT can do the same, but they would need to change it.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com
> <mailto:jakobsheep at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Kenneth, thanks for the quick reply. Ans as always, an answer gives
>     another question. The sanctions mentioned in Artículo 45 are only for
>     those that enforce 'confession', it does NOT state:" It's is strictly
>     forbidden to reveal the ideology of a person." But it would be like:
>     "It is strictly forbidden to enforce to have someone reveal his/her
>     ideologie." So I don not understand the argumentation NOT to share the
>     general assembly's minutes because of the LOPD.
>     In the Netherlands if someone does not want to have their name
>     published, they got a pseudonym for that purpose. Why don't you do it
>     the same way in Catalonia? Especially since it is so essential for the
>     transparency as you claim to support.
>
>     Anouk Neeteson
>     member international coordination Belgium and the Netherlands.
>     (proposing an international coordination team in France next AG in
>     Montreuil)
>
>
>     On 7 October 2012 09:23, Dario <dario at pirata.cat
>     <mailto:dario at pirata.cat>> wrote:
>     > 2012/10/7 Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jakobsheep at gmail.com>>
>     >>
>     >> Hi Kenneth, can you give me the precise text in the Spanish
>     LOPD ? I
>     >> am very curious how it states / defines:  " It's is strictly
>     forbidden
>     >> to reveal the ideology of a person." ? And I can not find it, but
>     >> again my Spanish is really bad :)
>     >
>     >
>     > http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t2.html#a7
>     >
>     >> Artículo 7. Datos especialmente protegidos.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> 1. De acuerdo con lo establecido en el apartado 2 del artículo
>     16 de la
>     >> Constitución, nadie podrá ser obligado a declarar sobre su
>     ideología,
>     >> religión o creencias.
>     >
>     >
>     > Quick translation:
>     >
>     >> Article 7. Sensitive data.
>     >> 1. By Constitution, nobody can be forced to tell about their
>     ideology,
>     >> religion or beliefs.
>     >
>     >
>     > And the fine for doing something like publishing the political
>     affiliation
>     > of people is stated here:
>     >
>     http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t7.html#a45
>     "Only"
>     > between 300.000 and 600.000EUR.
>     >
>     > --
>     > Dario Castañé
>     > http://www.dario.im | http://twitter.com/im_dario
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ____________________________________________________
>     > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>     > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>     <mailto:pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net>
>     > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>     >
>     ____________________________________________________
>     Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>     pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>     <mailto:pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net>
>     http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20121007/97b5e231/attachment.html>