[pp.int.general] Would you exclude a party from entering PPI?
Marko Mitrovic
archamond at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 22:39:12 CEST 2012
Yay, my country is one of the few that haven't signed TRIPS :)
Well, Pirates will naturally be for status quo when Pirate ideas and
principles become common practice. We are long way from that.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Pat Maechler aka Valio <pirate at valio.ch> wrote:
> I agree with both to a certain degree; a really totalitarian state
> ideology would be hard to justify.
> @ Jan: It depends what you mean with the status quo: I think those
> parties whose nations signed the TRIPS agreement should have
> objections to it, as it hard to justify this status as a common pirate
> vision of a world where information can be shared freely (at least to
> a certain degree).
>
> -pat
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Jan Lettow <janlettow at gmail.com> wrote:
>> An authoritarian pirate party would be a fraud.
>>
>> But what about the status quo? What if a pirate party demands things
>> stay as they are?
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list