[pp.int.general] Fwd: Really now?

[Thijs Markus]

There have been two people on this thread alone offering to sort it out 
- free of charge.

However, as admitting there is a problem under your supervision is the 
first step towards political suicide, and would-be politicians are all 
around, I dont see these offers being taken up or these issues resolved. 
This really does need to change - covering your ass from the get go and 
having that take presidence over the issues at hand. Method: degenerate 
the discussion into a blame game by absolving yourself at the outset at 
leaving it at that. Should this be challenged, you then cross your 
fingers that someone will pop up to restore the sweet and gentle peace 
while you lay low so you live to bullshit another day. Meanwhile, the 
issue remains unresolved. Does this all not sound eerily familiar with 
the failings of our so-called democracy? And sure, you can say I have 
done my detrimental share to this effect, but I only pick on the people 
actually politicising every single issue and trying to bullshit their 
way out of their responsibility, so they dont get spanked for it - hence 
I spank them anyway on the premise they're doing thus & only by pointing 
out their methodology.

Zbigniew Łukasiak schreef op 09.06.2013 13:31:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Pat Mächler
> <patrick.maechler at pp-international.net> wrote:
>> I have just scanned through the messages.
>> I would just put forward a general note.
>> The service with GoogleApps was set up out of convenience before the
>> Brussels conference. It was the solution that worked instantly for 
>> us, was
>> usable and did not require a lot of IT work. IMO even though we're a
>> political movement that is bound to IT like no other probably, it's 
>> actually
>> not that easy to get hold of people that are capable of setting up 
>> the IT
>> *and* are willing to provide the required time in the required time 
>> span for
>> free.
>
> I kind of agree that this is not an ideal solution - but it is a
> practical one.
>
> There is the expectation that if there is something non-ideal then it
> should be changed immediately by The Board.  This is not realistic 
> and
> starting long diatribes explaining why it is non-ideal is
> counter-productive, because most of us, and The Board probably as
> well, do agree that it is not ideal.
>
> Cheers,
> Z.
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general