[pp.int.general] Transparency in the party

[Cal.]

01/03/13 10.17, Anouk Neeteson:
> Another example, in the name of transparancy, I release so much data
> that few people could actually make a correct analysis to get a
> 'transparant' picture/understanding.

It is not very transparent to release non-pertinent data.

> So just data is not enough, my point is that just the word transparancy
> has a virtual/ethical meaning without a practical context.

Exactly. You need to know the logic behind (it should be in the
rationale section of orders).